47 pages • 1 hour read
Albert CamusA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Camus’s answer to the existentialist dilemma is absurdism, which confronts the meaningless, empty, arbitrary conditions of life not with resignation or denial or suicide but with defiant rebellion. Absurdists don’t expect to defeat absurdity—they never can—but they stand up to hopelessness with a gritty bravado that dignifies their everyday lives. Camus considers this solution superior to the existentialists’ attempts to overcome absurdity by trying to find something eternally valid in the universe. He declares that this cowardly evasion blinds one to an essential truth and amounts to a form of philosophical suicide.
Existentialism is a branch of philosophy that deals with the essential problems of existence, especially the dilemma of living in a universe devoid of meaning and arbitrary in its outcomes. The seeds of existentialism were planted by Kierkegaard, who struggled with these issues and resolved them with a “leap of faith” into the arms of Christianity. Nietzsche later delved deeply into the nature of belief and decided that modern life reveals the bankruptcy of most creeds and myths, which forces the thoughtful individual to find a way to reckon with meaninglessness. Other 19th- and 20th-century philosophers—Schopenhauer, Jaspers, Husserl—contributed further ideas on how to resolve these issues. Camus opted for what he called absurdism, a defiant stance that accepts life’s emptiness while refusing to give in to hopelessness or run away toward some reassuring creed.
Camus finds that humans are imprisoned by their need for arbitrary beliefs; as well, people become prisoners of the absurd fates handed out by an uncaring universe. Shackled to the prison cell of life, people must first free their hearts; at that point, there is “freedom of thought and action” (56), the ability to choose a path in the face of the meaninglessness and emptiness of all decisions.
Nostalgia, as Camus uses it, means a longing for old, comforting beliefs about God, eternity, and a reassuring afterlife. He writes of “nostalgia for unity, that appetite for the absolute” (17). Camus believes nostalgia lures existentialists away from their arid insights about absurdity and meaninglessness and back into the comforting arms of false certainties.
Camus views suicide as an understandable response to the emptiness of life. However, he questions whether it’s the correct answer and concludes that it’s a way of giving in to absurdity. He argues that it’s much better to live in defiance of the universe’s emptiness while staring directly at that emptiness at all times. The text also examines another form of suicide that Camus calls “philosophical suicide,” by which a thinker runs away from absurdity and into the arms of any convenient belief system that dispels the pain of emptiness.
By Albert Camus