logo

55 pages 1 hour read

Andreas Capellanus

The Art of Courtly Love

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1186

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Book 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Book 3: “The Rejection of Love”

Book 3 Summary

Addressing Walter, Andreas explains that he wrote the book because of his affection for Walter. However, Andreas does not believe wise men should devote their time to love. He wants Walter to be educated about love because rejecting love with full knowledge of its pleasures is more pleasing to God than rejecting it because one is ignorant about it. There are many reasons men should avoid love.

The first reason is that God condemns “the works of Venus” (187) outside of wedlock. Second, love can cause men to harm their neighbors instead of loving them, as commanded in the gospel of Luke. Third, love can cause men to become estranged from their friends. Fourth, “there is no sin more serious than fornication,” which “defiles both body and soul” (189). Fifth, a man in love is a man enslaved, with heart and soul vexed by suspicion and no longer living for himself. Sixth, love can result in poverty or, alternately, force men to accumulate wealth by dishonest means in order to feed his love. Seventh, love can be a source of torment for men in life and after death. Eighth, men should avoid love because “chastity and the restraining of carnal desires” (192) are the most praiseworthy virtues among both men and women. Ninth, love can cause every kind of “criminal excess” (193), from homicide and adultery to swearing oaths and idolatry.

A tenth reason Andreas opposes love is that he cannot see anything good coming from it. It causes men to lose “all honor in this world” and “their celestial heritage” (194) in the next. It can consume men’s minds, distracting them from honorable labor and service. It can inspire lechery, mental blindness, and war. It causes men to break up marriages. This violates the gospel of Matthew that declares husband and wife are “one flesh” (196), that men should not separate what God has joined together, and that man should love no other person as much as he loves his wife. Andreas urges Walter to resist the lure of love. He hopes that Walter’s “noble birth and excellence of character” (198) will guide him to spurn temptation and remain chaste.

An eleventh reason men should avoid love is that it weakens their bodies by depriving them of sleep, food, and drink. It also harms their digestion and, overall, shortens their lifespans. Twelfth, it causes men to lose their wisdom. Thirteenth, “no woman ever loved a man or could bind herself to a lover in the mutual bonds of love” (200). Andreas explains that this is because “every woman” is miserly, avaricious, envious, slanderous, fickle, disobedient, lacking restraint and self-discipline, gossipy, a drunkard, a wanton, prideful, vain, deceitful, and overall “prone to every evil” (201). This is true of all women, at all times, in all places, with no exception, “not even the Empress or the Queen” (208). Finally, Love harms men because he carries “unequal weights” (210), making men fall in love with women who are incapable of feeling and thus returning love.

Andreas acknowledges that his book contains two points of view. In the first part, he answers Walter’s request to understand the rules of love. If he wishes to practice love, the book will show him how to attain “all the delights of the flesh in the fullest measure” (211). However, Andreas believes this would harm Walter rather than make him happy. Thus, in the second half of the book, Andreas attempts to be useful to Walter by showing him why men should reject love. Doing so will ensure both honor in this world and “glory and life everlasting” (211) after death.

Book 3 Analysis

Book 3 fulfills the second part of Andreas’s implied promise to Walter in the Preface. Andreas elaborates on why he believes Walter should avoid love, reiterating his point that it is more impressive to reject love after one understands its potential pleasures than because one is ignorant of how to play the game of love. This again invokes the parable of the joy one sinner’s conversion brings to God. The parable could also be said to provide a superior spiritual alternative to knights braving danger to secure the love of women. In Andreas’s depiction, men brave the temptations of love that knowledge of it brings to prove their worth as men of the Christian God rather than servants of the pagan God of Love.

Andreas’s discussion of why men should avoid love borders on histrionic, suggesting that it can lead to homicide, war, and every possible type of worldly sin, finally culminating in eternal damnation. Whether it is a parody of similar Middle Ages tracts, didacticism by way of exaggeration, or a genuine reflection of his beliefs remains open for interpretation.

Marriage seems to provide the only possible acceptable version of love. It serves as a foil for the corrupt game of love affairs that cheapen sex and mock God by violating biblical commandments regarding marriage. Yet after discussing the importance of men respecting the bonds of marriage and the mutual love that should ideally exist within marriage unions, Andreas launches into a diatribe against women that allows for no exceptions among any class—lower, upper, or even royal. Women’s capacity for sin is total, and they are incapable of returning love. It could be that Andreas is referring specifically to love in the context of elicit love affairs, meaning women who engage in them are not in them for love but for the game or for the gifts. This could exclude marriage. Still, Andreas’s critique of women rejects any redemption for them. Again, whether this is meant seriously or as a parody remains an open question.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text