logo

45 pages 1 hour read

Elizabeth Rush

Rising: Dispatches from the New American Shore

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Human Interventions Exacerbate Environmental Degradation

One of Rush’s central arguments is that human interventions have caused untold damage to the environment. The destruction of wetlands in the United States began with the Swamp Land Act of 1850, which gave states the right to sell federal wetlands to individuals. These funds were then set aside for levee building and drainage of these areas. The goal was to “help convert areas previously ‘unfit for cultivation’” into agricultural and residential areas (80). This bill reshaped tidal and fresh wetlands across the country in less than 200 years. The state of Florida gave developers over 22 million acres of marsh. Over 90% of New York City’s wetlands were backfilled and hardscaped. New York, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Maryland have lost over 50% of their coastal wetlands. Cities like Boston, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC, “were all once so wet that no one dreamed of living there” (117). Ninety percent of the wetlands in San Francisco Bay vanished. 

Wetlands serve numerous important functions, including slowing shoreline erosion, absorbing surging waves during storms, serving as shelter and nesting sites for fish and migratory birds, and absorbing excess nutrients that would lower oxygen levels in the ocean. These marshes are the most nimble and imperiled types of ecosystems on the planet. Human activities, such as filling, diking, and hardscaping, have upset the freshwater–saltwater balance in the marshes across the United States. This shift has not only impacted the topography and biodiversity of these habitats, but also increased the vulnerability of coastal communities to rising sea levels and severe storms.

Providing one example of these dynamics is Isle de Jean Charles. The island was 10 times larger less than 50 years ago. However, over this time span, the sea has inundated the wetlands, continuing to shrink the island. Part of the reason for the sea level rise stems from the installation of oil rigs. As part of this installation, oil companies needed to dig access routes through the marsh. When the oil companies left, they were supposed to back-fill the channels, thus reducing the water flow through the marshland that surrounds and supports the bayou. The oil companies did not do this. As a result, the channels continue to grow wider each year due to erosion, which is why the gulf is now at the back door of community residents. The removal of the wetlands and bayous has made the community more vulnerable to flooding, which is why many decided to relocate.

By the end of Rising, readers understand how fragile ecosystems are, which is why it is difficult to be completely optimistic about the success of the Salt Pond Restoration Project. On the surface, the project seems wise. Rather than focusing on “which locations or ecosystems certain species need to survive” (239), they are creating “arenas where evolution can continue to unfold” (239). In essence, the project is trying to holistically restore entire ecosystems. As Rush points out, though, we are potentially entering the sixth mass extinction because of human intervention in the landscape. Humans have tried their hand at playing God and have not been successful since we are the reason behind this climate crisis. Rush worries that this project and other wetlands restoration projects will be more examples of humans exacerbating environmental degradation. 

Interconnectedness of Ecosystems

For millennia prior to the arrival of Europeans, hundreds of thousands of acres of wetlands hugged the shores of the United States. Many Native American communities inhabited these areas, where they harvested a number of different plant and animal species. These areas “belonged to no one, and so to everyone” (219). Within the span of just a few hundred years, monumental transformations turned wetlands into a commodity. Low-income housing, tech campuses, landfills, and planned communities replaced seas of grass. The loss of these wetlands has had profound impacts on entire ecosystems. To Rush, this loss is just the beginning. Human-induced climate change will likely result in the sixth mass extinction. 

Rush details how a single change reverberates throughout an ecosystem. One example involves the red knot or moon bird, which is “the size of a clenched fist” (36). Researchers recently discovered that juvenile moon birds are smaller than previously recorded in their arctic breeding grounds. This size reduction is due to these birds’ not being able to consume enough nourishment because “when ice melts earlier, the plants bloom earlier, and the insects that eat the plants emerge earlier too” (36). These smaller bodies come with shorter beaks. When they fly to their wetland winter feeding grounds, they are no longer able to dig for mollusks. They must consume less-nutrient-rich seagrass. This seagrass helps marshes adapt to rising sea levels, and thus, “bite by bite, the short-billed red knots unknowingly unknotting the web of their survival” (37).

Another example of this interconnection is the roseate spoonbill, which nests on the islands of the Florida Bay. These birds are specialist eaters because of their beaks. The spoonbills are having trouble finding their preferred niche. Since they cannot feed themselves, they are not breeding. For those that do breed, rising sea levels are extremely problematic. They require water that is just a few inches deep or else their nests fail and the chicks die. In addition, the presence of spoonbills is a sign that certain fish, such as kingfishers, redfish, and snook, are also there. These game fish are disappearing alongside the spoonbills. 

Climate Change Impacts Impoverished and Marginalized Communities the Hardest

Rush’s book recounts the history of people living in coastal communities. Indigenous groups during the colonial expansion era, runaway slaves, and other marginalized members of society would often seek out wetlands. These environments provided a safe harbor because they were challenging to attack and easy to defend. Moreover, most wealthy and white individuals considered wetlands undesirable. Starting in the 1940s, many of the wetlands in the United States were redeveloped as residential areas. The individuals who primarily moved to these communities came from low- and middle-income backgrounds. Wealthier individuals found these homes undesirable because they were flood prone and often located near polluted water, and they had the finances to move elsewhere. From this history, readers see that ancestors of current residents had no alternative but to settle in coastal areas. Many current residents also do not have the financial means to leave their homes.

Despite this situation, these residents are often blamed when their house floods. Nicole Montalto notes:

I hate when people write comments like, ‘Well you shouldn’t have lived there in the first place.’ Of course if we knew, we wouldn’t have been there. People don’t move into these places thinking, ‘Living here I might lose my life.’ No, there are builders who buy the lots and then they sell them and they spin it and you think you are living in a fine house. People buy what they can afford (109).

The NFIP has made this worse. Through its mapping of flood risk zones and conducting probabilistic risk assessments, flooding became viewed as a patterned, scientifically understood event. Individuals living in these areas are now expected to purchase insurance to manage the risk of living in flood-prone areas. Those who do no purchase insurance “are perceived as having participated in their own undoing” (150).

Rush strongly argues that this belief ignores the vulnerability of the people living in these communities. They have inherited this vulnerability from their ancestors, who moved into these areas to try and survive. It also does not take into account the financial circumstances of many living in wetlands. Flood insurance is becoming increasingly expensive, making it less and less likely that coastal residents can afford it. Communities that are already impoverished and marginalized are getting hit hardest by rising sea levels.

Rush worries that strategies used to combat climate change will only continue to hurt people of color and low- and middle-income people compared with more privileged individuals. Facebook recently constructed a campus on former tidal wetlands that today sits less than two feet above sea level. Its construction cost was $195,824,452. While the entire building is perched on stilts, it is still likely that Facebook will eventually need to move its office. Even with this move, its identity as a social media platform will remain unchanged. It did not elevate the roadways or storm pipes, though. When those flood, taxpayers will cover the bill. Yet, when the road floods on Isle de Jean Charles, the state will no longer repair it for Edison because most of the community has agreed to relocate. His identity is tied to the land, which is rapidly changing around him. To Rush, “the ability to move and remain unchanged is a privilege not shared equally by everyone and everything currently residing along the water’s edge” (245). It is for this reason that she remains concerned that sea level rise will deepen social and economic inequality.

The Debated Value of Organized Retreat

To Rush, “organized retreat is one of the few adaptive strategies that feels appropriately humble and at the same time acknowledges the scale of the threat” (249). However, it needs to be organized by the residents themselves. For example, a resident of Oakwood Beach proposed the idea of retreat to his neighbors. They created maps by hand of potential buyout zones and helped educate residents about what buyouts would mean. Residents of Oakwood Beach came to see buyouts as a chance to leave the long-neglected neighborhoods that had contributed to their vulnerability. After decades of petitioning the city for help against rising sea levels and largely being ignored, residents were ready for the fresh start that buyouts would bring. This example contrasts with the “green-dot” map in New Orleans, which was intended to guide reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina. However, it was created by government officials rather than as a local grassroots movement. The public rejected it.

Not everyone agrees with Rush that organized retreat is a strong adaptive strategy. She grows increasingly frustrated in the final chapter of Part 3 when her questions about moving Alviso are ignored by the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project team. To Rush, the project “and the innovative uses of dredged materials aren’t solutions in and of themselves” (248). She believes we are past the point where we can reverse rising sea levels. We need to let go of our image of what the coastline looked like in the past because it does not look like this today and it will not look like this tomorrow.

For her, organized retreat is not just about protecting people, but also about giving wetlands and the ecosystems that depend on them a chance at survival. Rush strongly believes that human life is no more valuable than the life of any other living being. Wetlands need the space to move upland and away from rising seas. They will only be able to do this if human communities retreat. To Rush, we can only create a more equitable global community if we give life a chance to adapt to climate change.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text