68 pages • 2 hours read
Jon MeachamAmerican Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House
Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2008A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Themes
Impact of Personal Character on Public Duty
A key thread in American Lion is how Jackson’s fierce loyalty, personal vendettas, and sense of paternalism shaped his presidential actions and policies. As personal loyalty was a defining aspect of his character, much of Jon Meacham’s biography of Jackson traces the president’s relationships with those around him and how those relationships influenced his decision-making. However, Meacham also suggests that Jackson’s personality had a more diffuse impact on his tenure as president, informing his overall attitude toward governance.
Jackson’s loyalty to his friends and allies often translated into political appointments and support, regardless of public opinion. For instance, Meacham cites Jackson’s reliance on his “Kitchen Cabinet,” an informal group of advisors composed mainly of friends and loyalists, as showcasing how personal trust dictated his administrative decisions. This loyalty extended to his fierce defense of those he cared about, influencing his response to political attacks and his steadfastness in the face of opposition.
Andrew Donelson and his wife, Emily, played particularly important roles in Jackson’s life and presidency, embodying the intersection of personal loyalty and public duty. Andrew, Jackson’s nephew, was more than a familial connection; he was a trusted aide and confidant who handled correspondence, advised on political matters, and served as a key member of Jackson’s inner circle. This personal connection shaped Jackson’s inner circle and influenced his political maneuvers, as he often turned to trusted family members and friends for counsel and support. Donelson, who lived with Jackson in the White House, was integral in managing the day-to-day operations of the presidency, ensuring that Jackson remained connected to both his political allies and the public. Emily also held a prominent position within Jackson’s administration. She served as the White House hostess, a role that extended beyond mere social functions to include acting as a de facto advisor and confidante. Her presence in the White House provided Jackson with a sense of familial stability and support that was crucial during the tumultuous years of his presidency. Emily’s charm and social acumen helped her navigate the complex political landscape of Washington, reinforcing Jackson’s position and policies through her influence.
Jackson’s loyalty was also evident in his interactions with key advisers and aides such as Martin Van Buren, William B. Lewis, and Amos Kendall. These individuals were not only political allies but also part of Jackson’s trusted inner circle. Jackson’s loyalty to his friends ensured that his administration was staffed by individuals who shared his vision and whom he could trust implicitly. This network of loyal advisors allowed Jackson to bypass the formal cabinet when necessary, creating a parallel advisory structure that reinforced his authority and decision-making. Meacham thus suggests that Jackson’s prioritization of loyalty played a key role in his expansion of the executive role.
More broadly, Meacham argues that Jackson’s loyalty extended to a paternalistic protection of his allies that reflected his vision of his role as a leader. He saw himself as a father figure not just to his immediate family but to his political “family” and, by extension, the nation. This paternalism influenced his public duty, as he felt a personal responsibility to shield his allies from harm and to guide the nation with a firm hand. However, Jackson’s paternalism was not always a benevolent force, as it influenced his Indigenous displacement policies—particularly the forced relocation of Indigenous tribes from their ancestral lands. While Jackson justified these actions as necessary for the nation’s expansion and security as well as for the survival of Indigenous Americans, this view masked the devastating impact on Indigenous communities. In such instances, Jackson’s conviction that he knew what was best for the nation led to policies that were coercive and harmful.
Expansion of Executive Power
In tracing Jackson’s legacy, Meacham focuses particularly on his role in transforming the office of the president. From his first day in office, Jackson demonstrated a willingness to challenge established norms and assert his authority. He believed in a strong executive branch with considerable influence over national policy and direction. In his opinion, the president was “the only official elected by all the people” and (xviii), as a representative of the people, had a unique mandate to act decisively and independently. This conviction drove Jackson to expand the scope of presidential powers, often bypassing traditional checks and balances to implement his vision for the nation.
Jackson’s use of the presidential veto was one of the most notable ways he expanded executive power. Before Jackson, vetoes were used sparingly and primarily for constitutional objections. Jackson, however, employed the veto as a political tool to shape legislation according to his vision. His predecessors “accepted the essential premise that Congress was the prime power” (140), but Jackson’s frequent use of the veto set a new precedent for presidential involvement in the legislative process. He vetoed more bills than his six predecessors combined. Jackson’s veto of the recharter of the Second Bank of the United States exemplifies his assertive use of executive power. Jackson’s veto of the bank’s recharter was not just a policy decision; it was a political statement that defined his presidency. It set a precedent for the use of the presidential veto as a tool for shaping national policy according to the president’s vision, and it reflected Jackson’s understanding of the relationship between the president and the US populace, as Jackson positioned himself as championing the interests of average citizens against those of the economic elite.
Jackson’s response to the Nullification Crisis further showcased his belief in a strong, centralized executive branch capable of taking decisive action. By requesting that Congress pass the Force Bill, which authorized the use of military force to enforce federal laws in South Carolina, Jackson took an unprecedented step in expanding presidential power. This move was a direct assertion that the executive branch had the authority to intervene in state matters to maintain national unity and (more broadly) that federal laws took precedence over state legislation.
Jackson’s expansion of executive power led to challenges and controversies. His assertive actions often sparked opposition and debate over the appropriate limits of presidential authority. Critics argued that Jackson’s approach threatened the balance of power and undermined democratic principles. One such controversy arose from Jackson’s defiance of the Supreme Court in the case of Worcester v. Georgia. The Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws on Cherokee tribal lands, affirming the sovereignty of Indigenous tribes. Jackson, however, refused to enforce the ruling, undermining the authority of the judiciary. Jackson’s refusal to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision reflected his belief that the executive branch had the discretion to disregard judicial rulings if they contradicted his interpretation of national interests. However, the impact of that decision on Indigenous Americans speaks to the potential dangers of concentrating power in a single figure.
Intersection of Private Lives and Public Roles
In addition to tracing the impact of Jackson’s temperament on his policy, American Lion more broadly considers how personal relationships, scandals, and private convictions influenced Jackson’s presidency. The most notable of these was the Eaton Affair, which revolved around the social ostracism of Margaret Eaton, the wife of Jackson’s secretary of war, John Eaton. Many members of Jackson’s cabinet and their wives shunned Margaret due to rumors about her moral character. Jackson’s fierce defense of Margaret, driven by his own experiences with malicious gossip against his late wife, Rachel, led to cabinet turmoil and resignations.
Jackson’s handling of the Eaton Affair demonstrated how private scandals, personal loyalties, and private grievances could shape political decisions and impact governance. His insistence on defending Margaret Eaton not only disrupted his cabinet but also exposed the tensions and rivalries within his administration. The impact on Secretary of State Martin Van Buren, who resigned to allow Jackson to reorganize his administration and restore harmony, had particularly long-lasting effects, as the Eaton Affair played a role in solidifying the political alliance between Van Buren and Jackson. Van Buren’s support for Margaret and his willingness to resign to help resolve the crisis endeared him to Jackson, paving the way for Van Buren’s succession to the presidency. Conversely, the Eaton Affair further strained Jackson’s relationship with Vice President John C. Calhoun, whose wife was one of Margaret Eaton’s chief detractors. This personal animosity contributed to the broader political rift between Jackson and Calhoun, who were at odds over issues such as states’ rights and federal authority. The affair exacerbated their political differences, ultimately leading to Calhoun’s resignation from the vice presidency.
The Eaton Affair also shed light on the role of women in the political sphere. The scandal was driven by the social dynamics and judgments of the cabinet members’ wives, whose opinions and actions influenced their husbands’ political decisions. This intersection of private social roles and public actions reflected the broader societal attitudes and norms of the time. Women like Floride Calhoun wielded considerable influence within their social circles, affecting the behavior and decisions of their politically powerful husbands.
The Eaton Affair also influenced public perception of Jackson’s administration. The scandal was widely covered in the press, and the public was keenly aware of the personal and political drama unfolding in the White House. This exposure had mixed effects, with some viewing Jackson as a staunch defender of personal honor and loyalty, while others saw his actions as evidence of an administration mired in petty conflicts and lacking in effective governance.
Related Titles
By Jon Meacham
