Affluenza

 Which of the symptoms of affluenza described in Part 1 of the book is the most dangerous or concerning in your view. Why?

The authors frequently praise the social and economic systems of certain European nations (e.g., Holland and Denmark) developed during the 20th century. How do they explain the very different trajectory of the United States in the same period? Are you convinced by this explanation?

Why do the authors think that conservatives should also be critical of affluenza? Do you think that this is a persuasive argument for conservatives?

Why does affluenza make us unhappy? What are some of the empirical claims presented by the authors for this position? Do you find this argument convincing?

Choose one prominent example of “the road not taken” discussed in the book; that is, an historical event that signaled a different path for the United States but was ultimately not followed. If things had gone differently, do you believe that our present society would be radically different? Why or why not?

Why is advertising “the prime carrier of the affluenza virus” (141)? What are some strategies to counteract advertising given by the authors? Do you think that these are effective? Why or why not?

Which of the cures for affluenza outlined in Part 3 of the book would you like to try? Do you think that this change could be permanently implemented on a large-scale? Why or why not?

In your view, which of the policy prescriptions outlined in Chapter 23 is the most important step to curbing affluenza? Do you think it is a realistic possibility for our present political climate?